4.2 Article

Tai Chi Improves Brain Metabolism and Muscle Energetics in Older Adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 359-364

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jon.12515

Keywords

Tai Chi; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; N-acetylaspartate; phosphocreatine recovery time

Funding

  1. Pilot Research Grant from Osher Center for Integrative Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital
  2. Harvard Medical School
  3. China Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSETai Chi is a mind-body exercise that has been shown to improve both mental and physical health. As a result, recent literature suggests the use of Tai Chi to treat both physical and psychological disorders. However, the underlying physiological changes have not been characterized. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the changes in brain metabolites and muscle energetics after Tai Chi training in an aging population using a combined brain-muscle magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) examination. METHODSSix healthy older adults were prospectively recruited and enrolled into a 12-week Tai Chi program. A brain H-1 MRS and a muscle P-31 MRS were scanned before and after the training, and postprocessed to measure N-acetylaspartate to creatine (NAA/Cr) ratios and phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery time. Wilcoxon-signed rank tests were utilized to assess the differences between pre- and post-Tai Chi training. RESULTSA significant within-subject increase in both the NAA/Cr ratios (P = .046) and the PCr recovery time (P = .046) was observed between the baseline and the posttraining scans. The median percentage changes were 5.38% and 16.51% for NAA/Cr and PCr recovery time, respectively. CONCLUSIONSOur pilot study demonstrates significant increase of NAA/Cr ratios in posterior cingulate gyrus and significantly improved PCr recovery time in leg muscles in older adults following short-term Tai Chi training, and thus provides insight into the beneficial mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available