4.5 Article

TERT promoter mutation is associated with worse prognosis in WHO grade II and III meningiomas

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 139, Issue 3, Pages 671-678

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2912-7

Keywords

Meningioma; Neuro-oncology; Prognostic factor; TERT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IntroductionTranscriptional activating mutations in the promoter region of the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene occur at high frequency in various types of solid tumors and have also been reported for meningiomas. Especially for atypical and anaplastic meningiomas, the prognostic relevance of TERT promoter mutation is yet unclear. The present study aimed to analyze the frequency of TERT promoter mutation and define its long-term prognostic significance beyond clinical and histological factors in a cohort of meningiomas WHO grade II and III.MethodsPatients undergoing surgical resection of aggressive meningiomas were included. Analysis for C228T and C250T mutation in the TERT promoter region was performed using PCR method. Patients were stratified into two groups (TERT mutated vs. TERT wild type). Univariate analysis was conducted using molecular and histological factors.Results87 patients with atypical (N=72) and anaplastic meningiomas (N=15) were included in the study. TERT promoter region was found to be mutated in 4 WHO grade II and 2 WHO grade III meningiomas. TERT promoter mutation was associated with shorter progression free survival than TERT wild type meningiomas (median PFS 12.5 vs. 26 months, p=.004). In the univariate analysis, TERT promoter mutation had a strong prognostic value on overall survival (p=.009) and progression free survival.ConclusionsPresence of TERT promoter mutation is associated with shorter progression free survival and overall survival in meningiomas WHO grade II and III. In these tumors, TERT promoter mutation should be considered as a clinically relevant prognostic factor to identify high risk patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available