4.0 Article

Different strategies of treatment for uterine cervical carcinoma stage I B2-II B

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 86-92

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i2.86

Keywords

Locally advanced cervical cancer; Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I B2-II B; Radiotherapy; Neoajuvant chemotherapy; Radical hysterectomy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uterine cervical cancer is the second most common gynecological malignancy. It is estimated that over 35% of tumors are diagnosed at locally advanced disease, stage I B2-II B with an estimated 5-year overall survival of 60%. During the last decades, the initial treatment for these women has been debated and largely varies through different countries. Thus, radical concurrent chemoradiation is the standard of care in United Sated and Canada, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery is the first line of treatment in some institutions of Europe, Asia and Latin America. Until today, there is no evidence of which strategy is better over the other. This article describe the evidence as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the main strategies of treatment for women affected by uterine cervical cancer stage I B2-II B. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available