4.4 Article

Endogenous Sex Steroids Dampen Neuroinflammation and Improve Outcome of Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 410-420

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12031-018-1038-x

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury; sex differences; Sex steroids; Stereology; Neuroinflammation

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01NS046072, R01NS092645]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role of biological sex in short-term and long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains controversial. The observation that exogenous female sex steroids (progesterone and estrogen) reduce brain injury coupled with a small number of clinical studies showing smaller injury in women suggest that sex steroids may play a role in outcome from TBI. We used the controlled cortical impact (CCI) model of TBI in mice to test the hypothesis that after CCI, female mice would demonstrate less injury than male mice, related to the protective role of endogenous steroids. Indeed, adult females exhibit histological protection (3.7 +/- 0.5 mm(3)) compared to adult male mice (6.8 +/- 0.6 mm(3)), and females that lacked sex steroids (ovex) showed increased injury compared to intact females. Consistent with histology, sensorimotor deficits measured as reduced contralateral limb use were most pronounced in male mice (31.9 +/- 6.9% reduced limb use) compared to a 12.7 +/- 3.8% reduction in female mice. Ovex mice exhibited behavioral deficits similar to males (31.5 +/- 3.9% reduced limb use). Ovex females demonstrated increased microglial activation relative to intact females in both the peri-injury cortex and the reticular thalamic nucleus. Ovex females also demonstrated increased astrogliosis in comparison to both females and males in the peri-injury cortex. These data indicate that female sex steroids reduce brain sensitivity to TBI and that reduced acute neuroinflammation may contribute to the relative protection observed in females.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available