4.4 Article

Recessive Stargardt disease phenocopying hydroxychloroquine retinopathy

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-3142-8

Keywords

Stargardt disease; ABCA4; Hydroxychloroquine toxicity; Phenocopy

Categories

Funding

  1. National Eye Institute/NIH [EY021163, EY019861, EY018213, EY019007]
  2. Foundation Fighting Blindness (Owings Mills, MD)
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, NY)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To describe a series of patients with Stargardt disease (STGD1) exhibiting a phenotype usually associated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinopathy on spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods Observational case series from Columbia University Medical Center involving eight patients with genetically-confirmed STGD1. Patients selected for the study presented no history of HCQ use. Horizontal macular SD-OCT scans and accompanying 488-nm autofluorescence (AF) images, color fundus photographs, and full-field electroretinograms were analyzed. Results All study patients exhibited an abrupt thinning of the parafoveal region or disruption of the outer retinal layers on SD-OCT resembling the transient HCQ retinopathy phenotype. Funduscopy and AF imaging revealed variations of bull's eye maculopathy (BEM). Five patients exhibited local fleck-like deposits around the lesion. Genetic screening confirmed two disease-causing ABCA4 mutations in five patients and one mutation in three patients. Conclusions A transient SD-OCT phenotype ascribed to patients with HCQ retinopathy is associated with an early subtype of STGD1. This finding may also present with HCQ retinopathy-like BEM lesions on AF imaging and funduscopy. A possible phenotypic overlap is unsurprising, given certain shared mechanistic disease processes between the two conditions. A thorough work-up, including screening of genes that are causal in retinal dystrophies associated with foveal sparing, may prevent misdiagnosis of more ambiguous cases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available