4.4 Article

A Monochrome Multiplex Real-Time Quantitative PCR Assay for the Measurement of Mitochondrial DNA Content

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 612-620

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.05.001

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Emerging Team grant on Cellular Aging and HIV Comorbidities in Women and Children [TCO-125269]
  2. University of British Columbia (UBC)
  3. UBC Centre for Blood Research
  4. CIHR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitochondrial DNA copies per cell (mtDNA content) can fluctuate with cellular aging, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction, and has been investigated in cancer, diabetes, HIV, and metabolic disease. mtDNA content testing in both clinical and basic settings is expected to increase as research uncovers its biological relevance. Herein, we present a novel mtDNA content assay developed on monochrome multiplex real-time quantitative PCR (MMqPCR) principles. This assay offers a greater than twofold improvement on time effectiveness and cost-effectiveness over conventional (monoplex) qPCR, as well as improved reproducibility given the reduced effects of human pipetting errors. The new MMqPCR method was compared with the gold standard monoplex qPCR assay on DNA from a variety of sources, including human whole blood, skeletal muscle, and commercial cell lines. The MMqPCR assay is reproducible (n = 98, r = 0.99, P < 0.0001) and highly correlated to the monoplex qPCR assay (n = 160, r > 0.98, P < 0.0001). Intra-assay and interassay variabilities, as established independently by multiple operators, range between 4.3% and 7.9% and between 2.9% and 9.2%, respectively. This robust assay can quantify >82 pg of template DNA per reaction, with a minimum mtDNA/nuclear DNA ratio of 20, and is especially suitable for studies that require high throughput.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available