4.5 Article

Anatomic and Functional Outcomes of Paramesonephric Remnant-Supported Laparoscopic Double-Layer Peritoneal Pull-Down Vaginoplasty Technique in Patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser Syndrome: Uncu Modification

Journal

JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 498-506

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.015

Keywords

Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome; Laparoscopic vaginoplasty; Neovagina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe modifications to the double-layer peritoneal pull-down laparoscopic vaginoplasty technique (Davydov operation) and evaluate anatomic and functional outcomes of the new technique, known as the Uncu modification. Design: Case series (Canadian Task Force classification III). Setting: Tertiary care university hospital. Patients: Women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MRKHS) who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2016. Interventions: Laparoscopic double-layer peritoneal pull-down vaginoplasty with paramesonephric remnant support to the neovagina. Measurements and Main Results: Long-term anatomic and functional satisfaction results. Twenty-seven women with MRKHS underwent surgery with the Uncu-modified Davydov procedure. At 1 year after surgery, the mean vaginal length in these patients was 7.91 +/- 1.4 cm. Among the 23 patients who had regular vaginal intercourse, the mean functional satisfaction score was 8.65 +/- 1.2. One patient had a perioperative bladder injury, and another patient had a rectovaginal fistula at 3 months after the operation. One woman who did not comply with the prescribed postoperative mold exercises had complete closure of the introitus. Conclusion: The Uncu modified laparoscopic double-layer peritoneal pull-down technique appears to be an effective and safe surgical management option that is easy to learn and perform by gynecologic surgeons. (C) 2017 AAGL. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available