4.5 Article

Magnetic Resonance Enterography to Assess Multifocal and Multicentric Bowel Endometriosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 697-705

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.037

Keywords

Colorectal endometriosis; Deep infiltrating endometriosis; Defunctioning stoma; Magnetic resonance imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Objective: To prospectively determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) compared with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for multifocal (i.e., multiple lesions affecting the same digestive segment) and multicentric (i.e., multiple lesions affecting several digestive segments) bowel endometriosis. Design: A prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France. Patients: Patients with MRI-suspected colorectal endometriosis scheduled for colorectal resection from April 2014 to February 2016 were included. Interventions: Patients underwent both 1.5-Tesla MRI and MRE as well as laparoscopically assisted and open colorectal resections. Measurements and Main Results: The diagnostic performance of MRI and MRE was evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs). The interobserver variability of the experienced and junior radiologists was quantified using weighted statistics. Forty-seven patients were included. Twenty-two (46.8%) patients had unifocal lesions, 14 (30%) had multifocal lesions, and 11 (23.4%) had multicentric lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, and negative LR for the diagnosis of multifocal lesions were 0.29 (6/21), 1.00 (23/24), 15.36, and 0.71 for MRI and 0.57 (12/21), 0.89 (23/25), 4.95, and 0.58 for MRE. The sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, and negative LR for the diagnosis of multicentric lesions were 0.18 (1/11), 1.00 (1/1), 15, and 0.80 for MRI and 0.46 (5/11), 0.92 (33/36), 5.45, and 0.60 for MRE. Lower accuracies for MRI compared with MRE to diagnose multicentric (p = .01) and multifocal lesions (p = .004) were noted. The interobserver agreement for MRE was good for both multifocality (kappa = 0.80) and multicentricity (kappa = 0.61). Conclusion: MRE has better accuracy for diagnosing multifocal and multicentric bowel endometriosis than conventional MRI. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AAGL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available