4.4 Article

Characterization of a Thermophilic Lignocellulose-Degrading Microbial Consortium with High Extracellular Xylanase Activity

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 305-313

Publisher

KOREAN SOC MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1709.09036

Keywords

Lignocellulose degradation; extracellular xylanase activity; thermophilic; alkaline condition; microbial consortium

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31200089]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China [201303080]
  3. Chenguang Planning Project for Fostering Scientific and Technological Talents of Wuhan [2015070404010189]
  4. Scientific and Technological Achievements Cultivation Project of Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences [2017CGPY01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A microbial consortium, TMC7, was enriched for the degradation of natural lignocellulosic materials under high temperature. TMC7 degraded 79.7% of rice straw during 15 days of incubation at 65 degrees C. Extracellular xylanase was effectively secreted and hemicellulose was mainly degraded in the early stage (first 3 days), whereas primary decomposition of cellulose was observed as of day 3. The optimal temperature and initial pH for extracellular xylanase activity and lignocellulose degradation were 65 degrees C and between 7.0 and 9.0, respectively. Extracellular xylanase activity was maintained above 80% and 85% over a wide range of temperature (50-75 degrees C) and pH values (6.0-11.0), respectively. Clostridium likely had the largest contribution to lignocellulose conversion in TMC7 initially, and Geobacillus, Aeribacillus, and Thermoanaerobacterium might have also been involved in the later phase. These results demonstrate the potential practical application of TMC7 for lignocellulosic biomass utilization in the biotechnological industry under hot and alkaline conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available