4.7 Article

Phosphoric acid-doped poly(ether sulfone benzotriazole) for high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 549, Issue -, Pages 23-27

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.11.067

Keywords

Poly(ether sulfone benzotriazole); Acid-base interaction; Proton exchange membrane; Fuel cell

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21504073, 21202134, 11447215]
  2. National Engineering Technology Center for Insulation Materials, Southwest University of Science and Technology [16kfjc08]
  3. Sichuan Youth Science & Technology Foundation [2016JQ0055]
  4. Postgraduate Innovation Fund Project by Southwest University of Science and Technology [17ycx021]
  5. Open Project of State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Nonmetal Composites and Functional Materials [11zxfk26]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel proton exchange membrane poly(ether sulfone benzotriazole) (PESB) was synthesized by polycondensation of 4,4-difluorodiphenylsulfone and 4-Hydroxy-1H-benzotriazole. The polymer structure was characterized by FT-IR, NMR and elemental analysis. The results were well consistent with the proposed structure. We introduced large amounts of benzotriazole into the polymer main chains by facile nucleophilic reaction, and proton transfer could be achieved through acid-base interactions of benzotriazole with phosphoric acid (PA). Compared with PA-doped m-PBI, the PA-doped PESB membrane showed higher proton conductivity due to the strong acid-base interactions between the benzotriazole and PA. The PA uptake of 221% PESB membrane displayed the proton conductivity of 0.073 S cm(-1) at 160 degrees C, which was higher than that of m-PBI. The fuel cell performance of the PA-doped PESB was evaluated and was obtained a maximum peak power density of 427 mW cm(-2) with an open cell voltage of 0.91 V at 160 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available