4.7 Article

One-pot approach to prepare internally cross-linked monovalent selective anion exchange membranes

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 553, Issue -, Pages 43-53

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.02.035

Keywords

One-pot; Sulfamerazine; Monovalent anion selective membrane; Internal cross-linked; Electrodialysis

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program 863 [2015AA030502]
  2. Public Welfare Project of the Science and Technology Committee of Zhejiang Province [2016C31010]
  3. National Key Research and Development Plan [2017YFC0403700]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676249]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, high performance internally cross-linked monovalent selective anion exchange membranes were prepared via a one-pot approach by simply adding different amounts of sulfamerazine (SF) to partially-quaternized chloromethylated polysulfone (QPSF). The composition and structure of the prepared membranes were studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Atomic force microscopy (AFM). The monovalent anion selectivity was evaluated by electrodialysis using a Cl-/SO42- system. The experimental results show that all QPSF-SF-x membranes exhibit excellent monovalent anion selectivity (P-SO42(Cl-) = 3.98-15.90) at an average pH level of 6.0 because of the presence of sulfamerazine, which can change the compactness and electronegativity of the QPSF membranes. Especially, the optimized QPSF-SF-0.09 membrane had a permselectivity of 24.55 at pH 10.0 and showed an excellent permselectivity in alkaline condition. Based on an overall consideration of the facile synthesis procedure and the excellent monovalent ion selectivity of the resulting membranes, this process is expected to inspire the further investigation of monovalent anion selective membranes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available