4.7 Article

In Silico Fragment-Based Design Identifies Subfamily B1 Metallo-β-lactamase Inhibitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages 1255-1260

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01728

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC)/Canadian Grant [G1100135]
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Research Council (BBSRC)
  4. Cancer Research UK (CR-UK) through Cancer Research UK Oxford Centre [C5255/A18085]
  5. EPSRC [EP/K039202/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MR/P007503/1, G1100135, MR/N002679/1, MC_PC_16092, MR/L007665/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1360493, 1231970] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K039202/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_16092, G1100135, MR/P007503/1, MR/N002679/1, MR/L007665/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zinc ion-dependent beta-lactamases (MBLs) catalyze the hydrolysis of almost all beta-lactam antibiotics and resist the action of clinically available beta-lactamase inhibitors. We report how application of in silico fragment-based molecular design employing thiol-mediated metal anchorage leads to potent MBL inhibitors. The new inhibitors manifest potent inhibition of clinically important B1 subfamily MBLs, including the widespread NDM-1, IMP-1, and VIM-2 enzymes; with lower potency, some of them also inhibit clinically relevant Class A and D serine-beta-lactamases. The inhibitors show selectivity for bacterial MBL enzymes compared to that for human MBL fold nucleases. Cocrystallization of one inhibitor, which shows potentiation of Meropenem activity against MBL-expressing Enterobacteriaceae, with VIM-2 reveals an unexpected binding mode, involving interactions with residues from conserved active site bordering loops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available