4.3 Article

Metagenome and Culture-Based Methods Reveal Candidate Bacterial Mutualists in the Southern House Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae)

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages 1170-1181

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjy056

Keywords

disease vector; 16S rRNA gene survey; microbiome; symbiont

Funding

  1. USFSM College of Science and Math Dean's funds
  2. Office of University Advancement
  3. College of Science Math

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mosquitoes are intensely studied as vectors of disease-causing pathogens, but we know relatively less about microbes that naturally reside in mosquitoes. Profiling resident bacteria in mosquitoes can help identify bacterial groups that can be exploited as a strategy of controlling mosquito populations. High-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing and traditional culture-based methods were used to identify bacterial assemblages in Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) in a tissue- and stage-specific design. In parallel, wild host Cx. quinquefasciatus was compared with our domestic strain. 16S rRNA genes survey finds that Cx. quinquefasciatus has taxonomically restricted bacterial communities, with 90% of its bacterial microbiota composed of eight distinctive bacterial groups: Nocardioidaceae (Actinomycetales), Microbacteriaceae (Actinomycetales), Flavobacteriaceae, Rhizobiales, Acetobacteraceae, Rickettsiaceae, Comamondaceae (Burkholderiales), and Enterobacteriaceae. Taking into account both metagenome- and culture-based methods, we suggest three bacterial groups, Acetobacteraceae, Flavobacteriaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae, as candidates for mutualists in Cx. quinquefasciatus. Members of these three bacterial families have been studied as mutualists, or even as symbionts, in other insect groups, so it is quite possible they play similar roles in mosquitoes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available