4.4 Article

Effects of G2-checkpoint dynamics on low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 6-7, Pages 1969-1997

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00285-018-1236-8

Keywords

Linear-Quadratic model; Induced Repair model; Early G2 checkpoint; Increased radioresistance; Hyper-radiosensitivity; Cell cycle; Cell cycle arrest; Mitotic catastrophe

Funding

  1. University of Alberta President's International Doctoral Award
  2. Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In experimental studies, it has been found that certain cell lines are more sensitive to low-dose radiation than would be expected from the classical Linear-Quadratic model (LQ model). In fact, it is frequently observed that cells incur more damage at low dose (say 0.3Gy) than at higher dose (say 1Gy). This effect has been termed hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS). The effect depends on the type of cells and on their phase in the cell cycle when radiation is applied. Experiments have shown that the G2-checkpoint plays an important role in the HRS effects. Here we design and analyze a differential equation model for the cell cycle that includes G2-checkpoint dynamics and radiation treatment. We fit the model to surviving fraction data for different cell lines including glioma cells, prostate cancer cells, as well as to cell populations that are enriched in certain phases of the cell cycle. The HRS effect is measured in the literature through <, the ratio of slope of the corresponding LQ model. We derive an explicit formula for this ratio and we show that it corresponds very closely to experimental observations. Finally, we identify the dependence of this ratio on the surviving fraction at 2Gy. It was speculated in the literature that such dependence exists. Our theoretical analysis will help to more systematically identify the HRS in cell lines, and opens doors to analyze its use in cancer treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available