4.7 Article

Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the face of external biophysical stressors

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.013

Keywords

Blue carbon; Ecosystem stability; Permanence; REDD; Regime shift; Transaction costs

Funding

  1. Department of Geography, National University of Singapore [R-109-000-141-133]
  2. Ministry of Education, Govt. of Singapore [R-109-000-166-112]
  3. NUS Presidents' Graduate Fellowship
  4. Harry S. Truman Foundation
  5. Basque Government's Postdoctoral Research Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Economic instruments such as Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes are increasingly promoted to protect ecosystems (and their associated ecosystem services) that are threatened by processes of local and global change. Biophysical stressors external to a PES site, such as forest fires, pollution, sea level rise, and ocean acidification, may undermine ecosystem stability and sustained ecosystem service provision, yet their threats and impacts are difficult to account for within PES scheme design. We present a typology of external biophysical stressors, characterizing them in terms of stressor origin, spatial domain and temporal scale. We further analyse how external stressors can potentially impinge on key PES parameters, as they (1) threaten ecosystem service provision, additionality and permanence, (2) add challenges to the identification of PES providers and beneficiaries, and (3) add complexity and costs to PES mechanism design. Effective PES implementation under external stressors requires greater emphasis on the evaluation and mitigation of external stressors, and further instruments that can accommodate associated risks and uncertainties. A greater understanding of external stressors will increase our capacity to design multi-scale instruments to conserve important ecosystems in times of environmental change. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available