4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical studies on the sluggish diffusion in face centered cubic Co-Cr-Cu-Fe-Ni high-entropy alloys

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 10, Pages 1791-1798

Publisher

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.02.003

Keywords

High-entropy alloys; Co-Cr-Cu-Fe-Ni; Sluggish diffusion; Numerical inverse method; Diffusion multiple

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51474239]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0301101]
  3. Huxiang Youth Talent Plan released by Hunan Province, China
  4. State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy Foundation, Central South University, Changsha, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On purpose of studying the sluggish diffusion of high-entropy alloys, three different face centered cubic Co-Cr-Cu-Fe-Ni high-entropy alloys were prepared, and assembled into three groups of sandwich-type diffusion multiple annealed at 1273, 1323, and 1373 K respectively. By means of the electron probe microanalyzer technique and recently developed numerical inverse method, the composition-dependent interdiffusivities at different temperatures were effectively evaluated by minimizing the residual between the model-predicted compositions/interdiffusion fluxes and the respectively experimental ones. After that, the tracer diffusivities were predicted based on the assessed mobility parameters and thermodynamic descriptions with the simplified ideal solution model. The comprehensive comparison between the interdiffusivities/tracer diffusivities in the Co-Cr-Cu-Fe-Ni high-entropy alloys and those in sub-binary, ternary, quaternary and other quinary alloys indicates that the sluggish diffusion exists in interdiffusion instead of tracer diffusion for the present Co-Cr-Cu-Fe-Ni high-entropy alloys. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available