4.6 Article

A sustainable adsorbent for phosphate removal: modifying multi-walled carbon nanotubes with chitosan

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 53, Issue 17, Pages 12641-12649

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-018-2494-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. State Scholarship Fund - China Scholarship Council
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1612441]
  3. Sino-Israeli Intergovernmental Scientific and Technological Cooperation Project [2015DFG92 450]
  4. Cooperative Project Between the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. Xinjiang Autonomous Region
  6. United States National Science Foundation [1561427]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phosphorus, a major culprit for eutrophication of aquatic environments, is dissolved in water primarily in the form of phosphate; hence, it is difficult to remove, and different materials are being investigated, aiming at high removal capabilities. Meanwhile, recovery capability must also be considered, since phosphorus present in wastewater may serve as a potential alternative resource for the mineral phosphorus. Carbon nanotubes are promising for the treatment of phosphate pollution; however, studies about their removal potential are limited. Herein, multi-walled carbon nanotubes were modified with chitosan through simply cross-linking to obtain a novel adsorbent for phosphate removal. Our data show that a maximum adsorption as high as 36.1 +/- 0.3 mg P g(-1) was achieved in 30 min at pH 3 and 293 K. The adsorption capacity of the composite (chitosan/multi-walled carbon nanotubes) could be maintained at 94-98% even after 5 adsorption-desorption cycles. An exothermic process was obtained, according to the Freundlich isotherm model. Based on the reported performance, the composite has a great advantage compared with other novel adsorbents for phosphate removal, indicating that the composite is a highly potential material to treat phosphorus-induced eutrophication of water bodies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available