4.8 Article

Too much of a good thing: sea ice extent may have forced emperor penguins into refugia during the last glacial maximum

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 2215-2226

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12882

Keywords

Antarctica; Aptenodytes forsteri; climate change ecology; molecular ecology; paleoecology; phylogeography; polynya; Ross Sea

Funding

  1. Australian Antarctic Science Project [4184]
  2. ANZ Trustees Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
  3. NERC
  4. Penguin Lifelines
  5. British Antarctic Survey Ecosystems Programme
  6. Darwin Initiative
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [1272500, bas0100025] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. NERC [bas0100025] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationship between population structure and demographic history is critical to understanding microevolution and for predicting the resilience of species to environmental change. Using mitochondrial DNA from extant colonies and radiocarbon-dated subfossils, we present the first microevolutionary analysis of emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) and show their population trends throughout the last glacial maximum (LGM, 19.5-16 kya) and during the subsequent period of warming and sea ice retreat. We found evidence for three mitochondrial clades within emperor penguins, suggesting that they were isolated within three glacial refugia during the LGM. One of these clades has remained largely isolated within the Ross Sea, while the two other clades have intermixed around the coast of Antarctica from Adelie Land to the Weddell Sea. The differentiation of the Ross Sea population has been preserved despite rapid population growth and opportunities for migration. Low effective population sizes during the LGM, followed by a rapid expansion around the beginning of the Holocene, suggest that an optimum set of sea ice conditions exist for emperor penguins, corresponding to available foraging area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available