4.6 Article

Influences of process parameters on surface roughness of multi-layer single-pass thin-walled parts in GMAW-based additive manufacturing

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 252, Issue -, Pages 128-136

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.09.020

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; GMAW; Surface roughness; Process parameters; Laser vision sensing; Low-carbon steel

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51505394, 61573293]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gas metal arc welding (GMAW) based additive manufacturing has been demonstrated to be a promising technique capable of reasonably utilizing materials and energies for manufacturing complex large-size metallic components. However, a critical issue in this technique is the deterioration of surface quality on the side face of fabricated parts. In this paper, a methodology based on a laser vision system was proposed to view the surface appearance on the side face of multi-layer single-pass low-carbon steel parts deposited in GMAW-based additive manufacturing, and a corresponding evaluation method was established to quantify the surface roughness. The effects of main process parameters, such as the inter-layer temperature, wire feed speed, travel speed, and constant ratio of wire feed speed to travel speed, on the surface roughness of thin-walled parts were investigated and discussed in detail. Based on the results, a better understanding of the influential mechanisms of the process parameters on the surface roughness can be obtained. With other parameters being constant, decreasing the inter-layer temperature is associated with the increase of the surface quality of thin-walled parts. Maintaining the ratio of wire feed speed to travel speed constant, the surface roughness increases with the increasing wire feed speed. A lower wire feed speed matching a lower travel speed can decrease the surface roughness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available