4.8 Article

Quantifying spatial habitat loss from hydrocarbon development through assessing habitat selection patterns of mule deer

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages 3961-3970

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13037

Keywords

animal movement; Bayesian hierarchical model; energy development; habitat selection; movement ecology; mule deer; natural gas; resource selection function

Funding

  1. Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW)
  2. White River Field Office of Bureau of Land Management
  3. ExxonMobil Production/XTO Energy
  4. WPX Energy
  5. Shell Exploration and Production
  6. EnCana Corp.
  7. Marathon Oil Corp.
  8. Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration [W-185-R]
  9. Colorado Mule Deer Foundation
  10. Colorado Mule Deer Association
  11. Safari Club International
  12. Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission
  13. Colorado State Severance Tax
  14. NSF [CNS-0923386]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extraction of oil and natural gas (hydrocarbons) from shale is increasing rapidly in North America, with documented impacts to native species and ecosystems. With shale oil and gas resources on nearly every continent, this development is set to become a major driver of global land-use change. It is increasingly critical to quantify spatial habitat loss driven by this development to implement effective mitigation strategies and develop habitat offsets. Habitat selection is a fundamental ecological process, influencing both individual fitness and population-level distribution on the landscape. Examinations of habitat selection provide a natural means for understanding spatial impacts. We examined the impact of natural gas development on habitat selection patterns of mule deer on their winter range in Colorado. We fit resource selection functions in a Bayesian hierarchical framework, with habitat availability defined using a movement-based modeling approach. Energy development drove considerable alterations to deer habitat selection patterns, with the most substantial impacts manifested as avoidance of well pads with active drilling to a distance of at least 800 m. Deer displayed more nuanced responses to other infrastructure, avoiding pads with active production and roads to a greater degree during the day than night. In aggregate, these responses equate to alteration of behavior by human development in over 50% of the critical winter range in our study area during the day and over 25% at night. Compared to other regions, the topographic and vegetative diversity in the study area appear to provide refugia that allow deer to behaviorally mediate some of the impacts of development. This study, and the methods we employed, provides a template for quantifying spatial take by industrial activities in natural areas and the results offer guidance for policy makers, mangers, and industry when attempting to mitigate habitat loss due to energy development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available