4.7 Article

Strong dependence of CO2 emissions from anthropogenic land cover change on initial land cover and soil carbon parametrization

Journal

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
Volume 29, Issue 9, Pages 1511-1523

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014GB004988

Keywords

earth system model; land cover change; terrestrial carbon cycle; decomposition; land use

Funding

  1. DFG Cluster of Excellence CLiSAP [EXC 177/2]
  2. Academy of Finland [decision 138359]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quantification of sources and sinks of carbon from land use and land cover changes (LULCC) is uncertain. We investigated how the parametrization of LULCC and of organic matter decomposition, as well as initial land cover, affects the historical and future carbon fluxes in an Earth System Model (ESM). Using the land component of the Max Planck Institute ESM, we found that the historical (1750-2010) LULCC flux varied up to 25% depending on the fraction of biomass which enters the atmosphere directly due to burning or is used in short-lived products. The uncertainty in the decadal LULCC fluxes of the recent past due to the parametrization of decomposition and direct emissions was 0.6PgCyr(-1), which is 3 times larger than the uncertainty previously attributed to model and method in general. Preindustrial natural land cover had a larger effect on decadal LULCC fluxes than the aforementioned parameter sensitivity (1.0PgCyr(-1)). Regional differences between reconstructed and dynamically computed land covers, in particular, at low latitudes, led to differences in historical LULCC emissions of 84-114PgC, globally. This effect is larger than the effects of forest regrowth, shifting cultivation, or climate feedbacks and comparable to the effect of differences among studies in the terminology of LULCC. In general, we find that the practice of calibrating the net land carbon balance to provide realistic boundary conditions for the climate component of an ESM hampers the applicability of the land component outside its primary field of application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available