4.7 Article

The stoichiometry of carbon and nutrients in peat formation

Journal

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 113-121

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014GB005000

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chinese Scholarship Council
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1019523] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Northern peatlands have stored large amounts (similar to 500 Pg) of carbon (C) since the last glaciation. Combined with peat C are nutrients such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and potassium (K), each of which plays an important role in plant production, litter decomposition, and the biogeochemical functioning of peatlands. Yet little attention has been given to the amounts of these nutrients stored in northern peatlands and their stoichiometry with C. Here we use data on nutrient concentrations in over 400 peat profiles in Ontario, Canada, representing bogs, fens, and swamps and their vegetation. We show that the C:N ratio is high (>40:1) in vegetation and litter but declines through the peat profiles to reach ratios between 22:1 and 29:1 in peat below 50 cm. In contrast, the C:P ratio rises from vegetation and litter (500:1 to 1300:1) to 1500:1 to 2000:1 in the lower part of the peat profile. Ratios of C to Ca, Mg, and K vary with peatland type. Most of these stoichiometric changes occur in the early stages of organic matter decomposition, where the litter structure remains intact. We estimate that similar to 18 Pg of N has been stored in northern peatlands since deglaciation, reflecting high N accumulation rates (similar to 0.8 gm(-2) yr(-1)), whereas P accumulation is small (similar to 0.3 Pg, similar to 0.016 gm(-2) yr(-1)), indicating that P is quickly recycled in the surface layers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available