4.7 Article

Ocean nutrient pathways associated with the passage of a storm

Journal

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 1179-1189

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015GB005097

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NERC [NE/I020083/1]
  2. University of Southampton PhD studentship
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I020083/1, NE/I019794/1, NE/I01993X/1, noc010009] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [NE/I01993X/1, noc010009, NE/I019794/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Storms that affect ocean surface layer dynamics and primary production are a frequent occurrence in the open North Atlantic Ocean. In this study we use an interdisciplinary data set collected in the region to quantify nutrient supply by two pathways associated with a storm event: entrainment of nutrients during a period of high wind forcing and subsequent shear spiking at the pycnocline due to interactions of storm-generated inertial currents with wind. The poststormincrease in surface layer nitrate (by similar to 20mmol m(-2)) was predominantly driven by the first pathway: nutrient intrusion during the storm. Alignment of poststorm inertial currents and surface wind stress caused shear instabilities at the ocean pycnocline, forming the second pathway for nutrient transport into the euphotic zone. During the alignment period, pulses of high-turbulence nitrate flux through the pycnocline (up to 1mmol m(-2)d(-1); approximately 25 times higher than the background flux) were detected. However, the impact of the poststorm supply was an order of magnitude lower than during the storm due to the short duration of the pulses. Cumulatively, the storm passage was equivalent to 2.5-5% of the nitrate supplied by winter convection and had a significant effect compared to previously reported (sub)mesoscale dynamics in the region. As storms occur frequently, they can form an important component in local nutrient budgets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available