4.1 Article

Metacognition of Multitasking: How Well Do We Predict the Costs of Divided Attention?

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 158-165

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/xap0000010

Keywords

divided attention; dual task; metacognition; multitasking; prediction

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG026263] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Risky multitasking, such as texting while driving, may occur because people misestimate the costs of divided attention. In two experiments, participants performed a computerized visual-manual tracking task in which they attempted to keep a mouse cursor within a small target that moved erratically around a circular track. They then separately performed an auditory n-back task. After practicing both tasks separately, participants received feedback on their single-task tracking performance and predicted their dual-task tracking performance before finally performing the 2 tasks simultaneously. Most participants correctly predicted reductions in tracking performance under dual-task conditions, with a majority overestimating the costs of dual-tasking. However, the between-subjects correlation between predicted and actual performance decrements was near 0. This combination of results suggests that people do anticipate costs of multitasking, but have little metacognitive insight on the extent to which they are personally vulnerable to the risks of divided attention, relative to other people.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available