4.6 Review

Photoluminescence properties of Mn4+-activated oxide phosphors for use in white-LED applications: A review

Journal

JOURNAL OF LUMINESCENCE
Volume 202, Issue -, Pages 263-281

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2018.05.053

Keywords

Phosphor; Mn4+; Oxide; LED; Photoluminescence; PLE spectroscopy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The photoluminescence (PL) properties of Mn4+-activated oxide phosphors are reviewed. The phosphor materials considered here are almost all the oxide phosphors ever-reported, including germinates, silicates, aluminates, perovskites, double perovskites, and so on. These oxide phosphors can be classified into three groups, namely, types A, B, and C, from their different PL spectral features. Phosphors of type A clearly reveal a zero-phonon line (ZPL) emission peak due to the E-2(g) -> (4)A(2g) transitions in the Mn4+ ion together with the Stokes and anti-Stokes sideband peaks; however, the type-C phosphors promise no clear identification of the ZPL emission peaks even in the PL spectra measured at cryogenic temperatures. The ZPL emission peaks in the type-B phosphors can be tentatively determined from an analysis of the PL spectra using a characteristic Poisson function. The ZPL absorption transition energies in the PL excitation spectra of the type-A, -B, and -C phosphors are determined by performing Franck-Condon analysis within the configurational-coordinate (CC) model. These transition energies and ZPL emission energies are used to obtain the crystal-field (Dq) and Racah parameters (B and C) of the Mn4+ ions in those Mn4+-activated oxide phosphors. Temperature dependence of the PL intensity is also analyzed on the basis of the CC model and found to be in excellent agreement with the experimental data when both the optical and acoustic phonon contributions are taken into consideration in the conventional thermal quenching model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available