4.6 Article

Rapid authentication of Pseudostellaria heterophylla (Taizishen) from different regions by Raman spectroscopy coupled with chemometric methods

Journal

JOURNAL OF LUMINESCENCE
Volume 202, Issue -, Pages 239-245

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2018.05.036

Keywords

Raman spectroscopy; Partial least squares discriminant analysis; Competitive adaptive reweighted sampling; Pseudostellaria heterophylla

Categories

Funding

  1. National Sciences Foundation of China [21375021]
  2. Key Project of Fujian Province [2015Y0050]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT15R11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quality of Pseudostellaria heterophylla depends on the growing area of the plants greatly. Compared with near infrared spectroscopy employed to discriminate the geographic regions before, the Raman signal is more obvious. So far, discrimination of P. heterophylla from different regions by Raman spectroscopy has not yet been realized. Hence, Raman spectroscopy coupled with chemometric methods to rapidly and effectively discriminate P. heterophylla from different regions was studied. Original spectra of P. heterophylla in wavenumber range of 4000-100 cm(-1) were acquired. Then, a steady and exact model, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), was constructed. And competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) was further used to extract effective wavelength spectral characteristic variables. Results show that CARS-PLS-DA model is an appropriate model to discriminate the P. heterophylla, with determination coefficient of calibration (R-C(2)), root mean square error of cross validation (RMSECV), determination coefficient of prediction (R-P(2)), and root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) are 0.9468, 0.1979, 0.9665, and 0.1120, respectively. These results demonstrated that the built method is useful and effective to discriminate P. heterophylla from different regions, which provide a new idea in the application of rapid field test.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available