4.7 Article

Evidence for Viral Interference and Cross-reactive Protective Immunity Between Influenza B Virus Lineages

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 217, Issue 4, Pages 548-559

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jix509

Keywords

Viral interference; ferret; influenza; influenza B; lineage; dominance; cross-protection

Funding

  1. Australian Government Department of Health
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health [HHSN272201400006C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Two influenza B virus lineages, B/Victoria and B/Yamagata, cocirculate in the human population. While the lineages are serologically distinct, cross-reactive responses to both lineages have been detected. Viral interference describes the situation whereby infection with one virus limits infection and replication of a second virus. We investigated the potential for viral interference between the influenza B virus lineages. Methods. Ferrets were infected and then challenged 3, 10, or 28 days later with pairs of influenza B/Victoria and B/Yamagata viruses. Results. Viral interference occurred at challenge intervals of 3 and 10 days and occasionally at 28 days. At the longer interval, shedding of challenge virus was reduced, and this correlated with cross-reactive interferon. responses from lymph nodes from virus-infected animals. Viruses from both lineages could prevent or significantly limit subsequent infection with a virus from the other lineage. Coinfections were rare, indicating the potential for reassortment between lineages is limited. Conclusions. These data suggest that innate and cross-reactive immunity mediate viral interference and that this may contribute to the dominance of a specific influenza B virus lineage in any given influenza season. Furthermore, infection with one influenza B virus lineage may be beneficial in protecting against subsequent infection with either influenza B virus lineage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available