4.7 Article

Functional group effects on a metal-organic framework catalyst for CO2 cycloaddition

Journal

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 478-483

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.04.010

Keywords

Metal-organic frameworks; Coordination polymers; CO2 cycloaddition; Cyclic carbonate; MOF-based catalyst

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20172010202000]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20172010202000] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [22A20130000031] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A variety of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have been reported as efficient catalysts for CO2 fixation reactions, such as cycloaddition to cyclic carbonates. The permanent porosity of the frameworks and the Lewis acidity of the MOF metal sites have been considered as the major contributors to the catalytic activity in the cycloaddition of CO2. In this study, we have, instead, focused on the effects of the organic functional groups for effective catalytic ability. A total of eight different functionalized Zr-based MOFs were tested. It was revealed that the non-functionalized pristine UiO-66 MOF (UiO = University of Oslo) showed the best conversion at low temperature (77% at 50 degrees C), whereas the hydroxy-functionalized UiO-66-OH MOF displayed the best conversion at high temperature (91% at 140 degrees C). The Zr-MOF could be recycled up to four times without a significant decrease in the reactivity. (C) 2018 The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available