4.2 Article

Optimising the collection of female genital tract fluid for cytokine analysis in pregnant women

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 458, Issue -, Pages 15-20

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.03.014

Keywords

Female genital tract fluid; Cervicovaginal fluid; Pregnancy; Cytokines; Menstrual cup; Ophthalmic sponge

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Clinical PhD Programme [WT102757/Z/13/Z]
  2. NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre [NG0215]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: To better understand the immunology of pregnancy, study of female genital tract fluid (FGF) is desirable. However the optimum method of collection of FGF in pregnant women for immunological methods, specifically cytokine measurement, is unknown. Methods: A prospective study of HIV-uninfected pregnant women comparing two methods of FGF collection: polyvinyl acetal sponge collection of cervical fluid (CF) and menstrual cup collection of cervicovaginal fluid (CVF). Samples were collected at 3 time points across the second and third trimesters: 14-21, 22-25 and 26-31 weeks. Multiplex chemi-luminescent assays were used to measure: IFN-gamma, IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL 10, IL-12, IL-13 and TNF-alpha. Optimal methodology for cytokine normalisation (sample weight, volume and total protein) was explored. Results: All cytokines were measurable in both fluid types. IL-beta, IL-8 and IL-6 were detected at the highest concentrations (ranking order CF > CVF > plasma). CVF collection was simpler, provided the largest volume of sample (median 0.5 g) with the potential for undiluted usage, and allowed for self-insertion. CF cytokine concentrations were intrinsically associated with sample weight and protein concentration however CVF cytokines were independent of these. Conclusion: Both methods of collection are robust for measurement of FGF cytokines during pregnancy. We recommend CVF collection using a menstrual cup as a viable option in pregnant women for high dimensional biological techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available