4.7 Article

Long term changes in flooding and heavy rainfall associated with North Atlantic tropical cyclones: Roles of the North Atlantic Oscillation and El Nino-Southern Oscillation

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 559, Issue -, Pages 698-710

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.072

Keywords

North Atlantic tropical cyclones; Flood; Extreme rainfall; Eastern United States; North Atlantic Oscillation; El Nino-Southern Oscillation

Funding

  1. U.S. Geological Survey [G14AP00172]
  2. National Science Foundation [AGS-1262099]
  3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce [NA14OAR4830101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study is to examine the contribution of North Atlantic tropical cyclones (TCs) to flooding and heavy rainfall across the continental United States. Analyses highlight the spatial variability in these hazards, their temporal changes in terms of frequency and magnitude, and their connection to large-scale climate, in particular to the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). We use long-term stream and rain gage measurements, and our analyses are based on annual maxima (AMs) and peaks-over-threshold (POTs). TCs contribute to similar to 20-30% of AMs and POTs over Florida and coastal areas of the eastern United States, and the contribution decreases as we move inland. We do not detect statistically significant trends in the magnitude or frequency of TC floods. Regarding the role of climate, NAO and ENSO do not play a large role in controlling the frequency and magnitude of TC flooding. The connection between heavy rainfall and TCs is comparable to what observed in terms of flooding. Unlike flooding, NAO plays a significant role in TC-related extreme rainfall along the U.S. East Coast, while ENSO is most strongly linked to the TC precipitation in Texas. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available