4.3 Article

Increased expression of enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) differentiates squamous cell carcinoma from normal skin and actinic keratosis

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 41-45

Publisher

JOHN LIBBEY EUROTEXT LTD
DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2013.2219

Keywords

actinic keratosis; EZH2; skin; squamous cell carcinoma

Categories

Funding

  1. Professional Development and Quality of Working Life Award from State University of New York

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) is a polycomb group protein that has been shown to be involved in the progression of multiple human cancers including melanoma. The expression of EZH2 in normal skin and in pre-malignant and malignant cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has not been studied. Objectives: We examined the expression of EZH2 in normal skin, actinic keratosis (AK), SCC in situ, well-differentiated (SCC-WD), moderately-differentiated (S CC-MD) and poorly-differentiated SCC (SCC-PD) to ascertain whether EZH2 expression differentiates these conditions. Materials and Methods: Immunohistochemical staining for EZH2 was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsies and a tissue microarray. containing normal skin, AK, SCC in situ, and SCC of different grades. Results: In comparison to the normal skin, EZH2 expression in actinic keratosis was increased (p = 0.03). Similarly, EZH2 expression in all of the neoplastic conditions studied (SCC in situ, SCC-WD, SCC-MD and SCC-PD) was greatly increased in comparison to both the normal skin and actinic keratosis (p <= 0.001). Conclusion: EZH2 expression increases incrementally from normal skin to AK and further to SCC, suggesting a role for EZH2 in the progression and differentiation of SCC. EZH2 expression may be used as a diagnostic marker for differentiating SCC from AK or normal skin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available