4.7 Review

The consensus on indications, conditioning regimen, and donor selection of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematological diseases in China-recommendations from the Chinese Society of Hematology

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13045-018-0564-x

Keywords

Consensus; Allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation; China; Indication; Conditioning regimen; Donor selection; Standard of care

Funding

  1. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81621001]
  2. Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81530046]
  3. National key research and development plan of China [2017YFA0104500]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province of China [2016B030230003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is widely used to treat malignant hematological neoplasms and non-malignant hematological disorders. Approximately, 5000 allo-HSCT procedures are performed in China annually. Substantial progress has been made in haploidentical HSCT (HID-HSCT), pre-transplantation risk stratification, and donor selection in allo-HSCT, especially after the establishment of the Beijing Protocol HID-HSCT system. Transplant indications for selected subgroups in low-risk leukemia or severe aplastic anemia (SAA) differ from those in the Western world. These unique systems developed by Chinese doctors may inspire the refining of global clinical practice. We reviewed the efficacy of allo-HSCT practice from available Chinese studies on behalf of the HSCT workgroup of the Chinese Society of Hematology, Chinese Medical Association and compared these studies to the consensus or guideline outside China. We summarized the consensus on routine practices of all-HSCT in China and focused on the recommendations of indications, conditioning regimen, and donor selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available