4.7 Article

Catastrophic failure in planar landslides with a fully softened weak zone

Journal

GEOTECHNIQUE
Volume 65, Issue 9, Pages 755-769

Publisher

ICE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1680/geot14.P.218

Keywords

failure; finite-element modelling; landslides; offshore engineering; shear strength; slopes

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council through an ARC Discovery grant [DP120102987]
  2. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering
  3. Fugro Chair in Geotechnics
  4. Lloyd's Register Foundation Chair
  5. Centre of Excellence in Offshore Foundations
  6. Shell EMI Chair in Offshore Engineering
  7. Institute of Advanced Studies at the University of Western Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Catastrophic landslides pose significant threats to life and property, and in the case of submarine landslides damage to offshore infrastructure. Although widely discussed, the triggering mechanisms and propagation criteria for catastrophic failure remain open issues. This study investigates a particular case of shear band initiation history: creation of a fully softened initial failure zone in a thin lens of a weaker material causing catastrophic failure of an infinite planar slope in sensitive clay under undrained conditions. The corresponding shear band propagation criteria were derived analytically using a process zone approach and validated numerically using a static large-deformation finite-element method. New analytical solutions taking account of elastic deformations within the shear band and in the entire sliding layer are established for both a linear strength degradation curve and an exponential strength degradation curve. Advantages of formulating propagation criteria in terms of the critical length of the fully softened initial failure zone (excluding process zones) are demonstrated, with the more realistic exponential degradation case producing a more stringent criterion than the linear degradation case.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available