4.7 Article

Hydrolysis and recycling of urea formaldehyde resin residues

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 355, Issue -, Pages 96-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.05.019

Keywords

Hazardous waste; Urea formaldehyde resin; Hydrolysis; Recycle

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA)
  2. McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Research Program
  3. Forest AMP
  4. Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University [SB929, MS 39762-9820]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urea formaldehyde (UF) resin residues generate many poisonous chemicals during traditional disposal technologies for organic hazardous wastes. In this study, hydrothermal hydrolysis was developed to decompose, remove, and recycle cured UF resin. Under 140 degrees C and 2 h of hydrothermal process, 20 mL of either 2 M HCl or 30 w.t. % of formaldehyde solutions can decompose as much as 1.7 g of cured UF resin. In addition, from the attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), gas chromatography mass spectroscopy (GC-MS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and H-1 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analyses, it confirmed that the hydrothermal hydrolysis could hydrolyze cured UF resin. With 2 M HCl, the hydrolysis of cured UF resin can form NH4Cl as the final product. Moreover, formaldehyde solution hydrolysis can fully recycle the decomposed UF resin. The hydrolyzed formaldehyde solution can be directly used as a normal formaldehyde solution for UF resin synthesis. The synthesized resin, which contains about 6 w.t. % of decomposed cured UF resin, has similar chemical structures and bonding performance as normal UF resin. These hydrolysis methods generate no harmful gases and pollutants, nor any pre- or post-treatments, which proves its feasibility in UF resin residues safe removal or disposal and recycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available