Journal
GEOSTANDARDS AND GEOANALYTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 419-432Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.2015.00334.x
Keywords
IAG; certified reference materials; geochemical reference materials; certification protocol; proficiency tests
Categories
Funding
- IAG
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The IAG conducts two programmes, the GeoPT (TM) proficiency test and a certification programme that are closely interconnected. Both support the quality control/quality assurance activities of geochemical laboratories. Each derives an estimate of 'true value' for a number of samples, but arrives at that estimate, and its uncertainty, differently. This review discusses the history of the two programmes and compares the 'true values' and their uncertainties obtained through each. It then considers 'fitness-for-purpose' issues related to both GeoPT (TM) and certification uncertainties. Issues related to potential modification of the IAG protocol for certification are also considered.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available