4.7 Article

Mesoporous TiO2 with WO3 functioning as dopant and light-sensitizer: A highly efficient photocatalyst for degradation of organic compound

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 358, Issue -, Pages 44-52

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.06.039

Keywords

Mesoporous; TiO2; WO3 dopant; WO(3)modification; Heterojunction; Photocatalytic activity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478214, 51608175, 51468044, 51608250, 51720105001]
  2. Key Project of Research and Development Plan of Jiangxi Province [2016ACG70001]
  3. Distinguished Young Scholars Program by Jiangxi Province [20162BCB23042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The suitable doping or modification on TiO2 holds promise for improving charge separation and extending light absorption range. Here, WO3 modifying reduced band gap mesoporous TiO2 (WO3/RM-TiO2) due to WO3 doping was successfully fabricated by immersing mesoporous TiO2 nanoparticles in the peroxotungstic acid sol with controllable reaction time (0-1 h). The W6+ ions were first incorporated into the TiO2 lattice to form W-O-Ti bonds, resulting in the formation of WO3 doping TiO2. Then, WO3 nanoparticles gradually formed and attached on the TiO2 surface, constructing a novel heterojunction catalyst with WO3 serving as both dopant and light-sensitizer for TiO2. Photocatalytic activity of the resulting WO3/RM-TiO2 depends on the immersing duration in the peroxotungstic acid. The BET analysis shows that 0.5 h-WO3/FtM-TiO2 has the largest pore volume of 0.491 cm(3) g(-1) and the highest surface area of 82.3 m(2) g(-1), whereas these values decline with prolonged immersing duration. As expected, the optimal efficiency in removing p-nitrophenol (PNP) is achieved over 0.5 h-WO3/RM-TiO2 under visible light irradiation, which is 2.33 times that of the unmodified M-TiO2. This should be attributed to the suitable WO3 doping and WO3 modification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available