4.7 Article

Development of bioreactors for comparative study of natural attenuation, biostimulation, and bioaugmentation of petroleum-hydrocarbon contaminated soil

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 342, Issue -, Pages 270-278

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.044

Keywords

Biodegradation; Biotransformation; Bacteria; Oil spill; Kinetic model

Funding

  1. National Science Fundation CAREER award [1255021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioremediation of soil and groundwater sites contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbons is known as a technically viable, cost-effective, and environmentally sustainable technology. The purpose of this study is to investigate laboratory-scale bioremediation of petroleum-hydrocarbon contaminated soil through development of eight bioreactors, two bioreactors for each bioremediation mode. The modes were: (1) natural attenuation (NA); (2) biostimulation (BS) with oxygen and nutrients; (3) bioaugmentation (BA) with hydrocarbon degrading isolates; (4) a combination of biostimulation and bioaugmentation (BS BA). Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) mass balance over the bioreactors showed about 2% of initial 20,000 mg kg-soil(-1) TPH was removed by advection due to synthetic groundwater which was flowing through the soil, and the rest of decrease in TPH was caused by biodegradation. The BS-BA mode showed the highest TPH biodegradation percentage (89.7 +/- 0.3%) compared to the NA (51.4 +/- 0.6%), BS (81.9 +/- 0.3%) and BA (62.9 +/- 0.5%) modes. Furthermore, an increase in microbial population was another evidence of TPH biodegradation by microorganism. Reaction rate data from each bioremediation mode were fitted with a first-order reaction rate model. The Monod kinetic constants including maximum specific growth rate of microorganisms (mu(max)) and substrate concentration at half-velocity constant (K-s) were estimated for each bioremediation modes. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available