4.7 Article

Molecular-level insights into mercury removal mechanism by pyrite

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 344, Issue -, Pages 104-112

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.011

Keywords

Mercury removal; Adsorption mechanism; Pyrite; Density functional theory; HgS

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51376072, 51661145010]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2015CFA046]
  3. Huazhong University of Science and Technology [5003120001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Natural pyrite (FeS2) has been regarded as a kind of potential sorbents to control mercury emission from coal-fired power plants because of its low cost and high affinity between mercury and FeS2. Theoretical investigations based on density functional theory (DFT) were carried out to discern mercury adsorption, reaction and desorption mechanisms over pyrite surface. DFT calculation results indicate that Hg-0 adsorption on FeS2(100) and FeS2(110) surfaces is dominated by physisorption and chemisorption mechanisms, respectively. Mercury atom interacts strongly with Fe atom on FeS2(110) surface through the atomic orbital hybridization and overlap. HgS is chemically adsorbed on FeS2(100) and FeS2(110) surfaces. Electron density difference analysis implies that the significant charge accumulation around sulfur atom of adsorbed HgS molecule is closely associated with the strong interaction between gaseous HgS and pyrite surface. The reaction pathway leading to the formation of gaseous HgS is a three-step process: Hg-0 -> Hg(ads) -> HgS(ads) -> HgS. In the second step, the energy barrier of diatomic surface reaction between adsorbed Hg-0 and S2- monomer is approximately 17 kJ/mol. The third step is an endothermic process which requires an external energy of about 414.60 kJ/mol to desorb the formed HgS, and is the rate-determining step. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available