4.7 Article

Comparison analysis on the thermal runaway of lithium-ion battery under two heating modes

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 344, Issue -, Pages 733-741

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.11.022

Keywords

Lithium ion battery safety; Thermal runaway; External heating; Internal heating; Thermal stability

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0100306]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674228]
  3. External Cooperation Program of BIC, CAS [211134KYSB20150004]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2320000034]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS [2013286]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thermal stability evaluation of materials in a soft-pack commercial cell is tested using C80 calorimeter, including anode, cathode, separator and full cell (mixing of the three materials including additional electrolyte). Thermal runaway characteristic of the commercial cell is tested on the accelerating rate calorimeter (ARC) with two heating modes, including internal heating mode and external heating mode. The results show that the thermal stability of internal material for tested cell follows the below order: anode < separator < cathode. The voltage drop is influenced by the consumption of cathode and separator, while the effect of anode consumption on the voltage can be negligible. Both onset temperature and critical temperature in external heating mode are larger than that in internal heating mode. Thermal runaway induced by high temperature of the tested cell can be divided into three stages: 1) the cell can work under normal mode and all the internal exothermal reaction can be ignorable, 2) the exothermal of anode which can be detected and the thermal runaway can be stopped by effective heat dissipation, and 3) the cathode reaction and separator melting which cause the cell voltage drop and thermal runaway of the cell is inevitable in this stage. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available