4.5 Article

Improvement of Surface Erosion Resistance of Sand by Microbial Biopolymer Formation

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001900

Keywords

Erosion; Microbial activity; Biopolymer; Soil improvement

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning) [2017R1C1B2007173]
  2. Technology Advancement Research Program (TARP) - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport of the Korean government [17CTAP-C129729-01]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1C1B2007173] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct use of naturally occurring microbes for soil improvement has recently gained attention due to their ubiquitous and versatile characteristics in subsurface soil. Microbes produce soft and sticky extracellular polymeric substances (or biopolymers) that are known to alter the hydrological characteristics of soils; however, the mechanisms and extent of such soft biopolymers in altering soil erosion resistance remain scarcely explored. This study explored the role of microbial biopolymers in soil erosion resistance. The surface erosion resistance of sandy soils was evaluated by using a hybrid erosion function apparatus, in which the model bacteria Leuconostoc mesenteroides were stimulated to produce an insoluble biopolymer. The results revealed that the microbial biopolymer formation increased the critical shear stress and surface erosion resistance, which the researchers attributed to the increased cohesion by grain-coating biopolymer slimes and the reduced seepage flows due to pore clogging. This study provides baseline but promising results on how microbially grown biopolymers can be used to improve soil erosion resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available