Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 57-62Publisher
KERMAN UNIV MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.61
Keywords
Consumer Participation; Health Policy; Decision-Making; Public Preferences; Citizens' Jury (CJ); Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE)
Funding
- Australian Research Council Linkage [LP100200446]
- Queensland Government Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Queensland Health and Griffith University
- Australian Research Council [LP100200446] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Despite progress towards greater public engagement, questions about the optimal approach to access public preferences remain unanswered. We review two increasingly popular methods for engaging the public in healthcare priority-setting and determining their preferences; the Citizens' Jury (CJ) and Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). We discuss the theoretical framework from which each method is derived, its application in healthcare, and critique the information it can provide for decision-makers. We conclude that combining deliberation of an informed public via CJs and quantification of preferences using DCE methods, whilst it remains to be tested as an approach to engaging the public in priority-setting, could potentially achieve much richer information than the application of either method in isolation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available