3.8 Article

Assessment of land use factors associated with dengue cases in Malaysia using Boosted Regression Trees

Journal

SPATIAL AND SPATIO-TEMPORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages 75-84

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.sste.2014.05.002

Keywords

Aedes mosquitoes; Boosted Regression Trees; Horticulture; Human settlements; Environmental; Land use

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health Malaysia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The transmission of dengue disease is influenced by complex interactions among vector, host and virus. Land use such as water bodies or certain agricultural practices have been identified as likely risk factors for dengue because of the provision of suitable habitats for the vector. Many studies have focused on the land use factors of dengue vector abundance in small areas but have not yet studied the relationship between land use factors and dengue cases for large regions. This study aims to clarify if land use factors other than human settlements, e.g. different types of agricultural land use, water bodies and forest are associated with reported dengue cases from 2008 to 2010 in the state of Selangor, Malaysia. From the correlative relationship, we aim to generate a prediction risk map. We used Boosted Regression Trees (BRT) to account for nonlinearities and interactions between the factors with high predictive accuracies. Our model with a cross-validated performance score (Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve, ROC AUC) of 0.81 showed that the most important land use factors are human settlements (model importance of 39.2%), followed by water bodies (16.1%), mixed horticulture (8.7%), open land (7.5%) and neglected grassland (6.7%). A risk map after 100 model runs with a cross-validated ROC AUC mean of 0.81 (+/- 0.001 s.d.) is presented. Our findings may be an important asset for improving surveillance and control interventions for dengue. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available