4.6 Article

Determination of nuclear magnetic resonance T2 cutoff value based on multifractal theory - An application in sandstone with complex pore structure

Journal

GEOPHYSICS
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages D11-D21

Publisher

SOC EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICISTS
DOI: 10.1190/GEO2014-0140.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41404086]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M560591]
  3. Major National Science and Technology Projects of China [2011ZX05020-008]
  4. National Key Foundation for Exploring Scientific Instrument of China [2013YQ170463]
  5. CNPC Science and Technology Project [2012E-34-12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cutoff value of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) transversal relaxation time T-2 is vital for pore structure characterization, permeability prediction, and irreducible water saturation calculation. Conventional default values often lead to inaccurate results for rocks with complex pore structure. Based on NMR experiments and multifractal theory, we have developed an effective statistical method to predict T-2 cutoff values without other petrophysical information. The method is based on multifractal theory to analyze the NMR T-2 spectrum with the assumption that the T-2 spectrum is an indicator of pore size distribution. Multifractal parameters, such as multifractal dimension, singularity strength, and mass exponent, are calculated to investigate the multifractal behavior of T-2 spectrum via NMR experiments and a dyadic scaling-down algorithm. To obtain the optimal T-2 cutoff value, the rotation speed and time of centrifugation are enlarged increasingly to optimal centrifugal state. A predicating model for T-2 cutoff value based on multiple linear regressions of multifractal parameters was proposed after studying the influential factors. On the basis of the multifractal analysis of NMR T-2 spectrum, a reasonable predication model for T2 cutoff value was rendered. Upon testing, the predicted results were highly consistent with the experimental results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available