4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Development and validation of UHPLC MS/MS methods for determination of neonicotinoid insecticides in royal jelly-based products

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 105-113

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2018.05.002

Keywords

DLLME; Food analysis; Food composition; Food safety; Insecticides; Neonicotinoids; Royal jelly; SPE; UHPLC MS/MS

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry Economia, Industria y Competitividad
  2. INIA grant [RTA2013-00042-C10-03, RTA2013-00042-C10-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, new methods have been proposed to determine seven neonicotinoid insecticides (dinotefuran, nitenpyram, thiamethoxam, clothianidin, imidacloprid, acetamiprid and thiacloprid) in royal jelly-based products, by means of ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to a quadrupole-time-of-flight mass detector. Efficient sample treatments (with average analyte recoveries between 83% and 109%) involving solid phase extraction (polymeric sorbent, Strata. X) and a dispersive liquid liquid microextraction, were proposed to determine these neonicotinoids in liquid dietary supplements containing freeze-dried royal jelly and fresh royal jelly, respectively. Chromatographic analysis (8 min) was performed on a core-shell technology-based column (Kinetex EVO C18). Both methods were fully validated and the data demonstrated that they are consistent, reliable and have a wide linear range of applicability. Low limits of quantification, ranging from 2.5 to 9.5 g/kg, were obtained in all cases, and it was necessary to employ matrix-matched standards for correct quantification of three of the compounds in each of the royal jelly-based products. Finally, the proposed methods were applied to neonicotinoid analysis of royal jelly-based products from different Spanish regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available