4.6 Article

Bioaccessibility in risk-benefit analysis of raw and cooked seabream consumption

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 118-127

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2016.10.003

Keywords

Food analysis; Gilthead seabream; Arsenic; Mercury; Methylmercury; Selenium; Essential elements; Contaminants; Bioaccessibility; Risk-benefit assessment

Funding

  1. project GOODFISH [PTDC/SAU-ESA/103825/2008]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [SFRH/BPD/64951/2009, SFRH/BPD/102689/2014]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/64951/2009, PTDC/SAU-ESA/103825/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The composition of raw and cooked gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) was analysed. The bioaccessibility of arsenic (As), selenium (Se), mercury (Hg), and methylmercury (MeHg) in raw and cooked fish was studied by an in vitro model. A risk-benefit assessment was performed taking into account bioaccessibility. The content of contaminants Hg and As displayed a significant increase for every culinary treatment, only As content in boiled fish did not increase. Regarding bioaccessibility, while bioaccessible As was high (over 96%), the share of Hg (and MeHg) available for intestinal absorption was reduced by cooking, especially by grilling, 39% (60%) and roasting, 38% (55%). The risk-benefit probabilistic assessment leads to an advice of not exceeding one weekly meal of gilthead seabream. This recommendation concerns mainly pregnant and nursing women. However, Se bioaccessibility was high -minimum of 85% in boiled seabream-, thus helping to balance the deleterious effects of MeHg. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available