4.5 Article

Spatially and Temporally Optimal Biomass Procurement Contracting for Biorefineries

Journal

BIORESOURCES
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 2069-2089

Publisher

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV DEPT WOOD & PAPER SCI

Keywords

Cellulosic biofuels; Biomass; Biorefinery; Supply; Harvest shed

Funding

  1. USDA-NIFA [2012-67009-19693]
  2. NIFA [2012-67009-19693, 578416] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper evaluates the optimal composition of annual and perennial biomass feedstocks for a biorefinery. A generic optimization model is built to minimize costs - harvest, transport, storage, seasonal, and environmental costs - subject to various constraints on land availability, feedstock availability, processing capacity, contract terms, and storage losses. The model results are demonstrated through a case study for a midwestern U.S. location, focusing on bioethanol as the likely product. The results suggest that high-yielding energy crops feature prominently (70 to 80%) in the feedstock mix in spite of the higher establishment costs. The cost of biomass ranges from 0.16 to 0.20 $ l(-1) (US$ 0.60 to $0.75 per gallon) of biofuel. The harvest shed shows that high-yielding energy crops are preferably grown in fields closer to the biorefinery. Low-yielding agricultural residues primarily serve as a buffer crop to meet the shortfall in biomass requirement. For the case study parameters, the model results estimated a price premium for energy crops (2 to 4 $ t(-1) within a 16 km (10-mile) radius) and agricultural residues (5 to 17 $ t(-1) in a 16 to 20 km (10 to 20 mile) radius.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available