4.7 Article

On the enigmatic similarity in Greenland δ18O between the Oldest and Younger Dryas

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 42, Issue 23, Pages 10470-10477

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015GL066042

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The last deglaciation (20.0-10.0 kyr B.P.) was punctuated by two major cooling events affecting the Northern Hemisphere: the Oldest Dryas (OD; 18.0-14.7 kyr B.P.) and the Younger Dryas (YD; 12.8-11.5 kyr B.P.). Greenland ice core delta O-18 temperature reconstructions suggest that the YD was as cold as the OD, despite a 50 ppmv increase in atmospheric CO2, while modeling studies suggest that the YD was approximately 4-5 degrees C warmer than the OD. This discrepancy has been surmised to result from changes in the origin of the water vapor delivered to Greenland; however, this hypothesis has not been hitherto tested. Here we use an atmospheric circulation model with an embedded moisture-tracing module to investigate atmospheric processes that may have been responsible for the similar delta O-18 values during the OD and YD. Our results show that the summer-to-winter precipitation ratio over central Greenland in the OD is twice as high as in the YD experiment, which shifts the delta O-18 signal toward warmer (summer) temperatures (enriched delta O-18 values and it accounts for similar to 45% of the expected YD-OD delta O-18 difference). A change in the inversion (cloud) temperature relationship between the two climate states further contributes (similar to 20%) to altering the delta O-18-temperature-relation model. Our experiments also show a 7% decrease of delta O-18-depleted precipitation from distant regions (e.g., the Pacific Ocean) in the OD, hence further contributing (15-20%) in masking the actual temperature difference. All together, these changes provide a physical explanation for the ostensible similarity in the ice core delta O-18 temperature reconstructions in Greenland during OD and YD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available