4.3 Article

An alternative evolutionary pathway for the twin-tail goldfish via szl gene mutation

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.22811

Keywords

artificial selection; axial skeleton; dorsal-ventral patterning; szl

Funding

  1. Career Development Award, Academia Sinica, Taiwan [CDA-103-L05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The twin-tail of ornamental goldfish provides unique evolutionary evidence that the highly conserved midline localization of axial skeleton components can be changed by artificial selection. This morphological change is known to be caused by a nonsense mutation in one of the recently duplicated chordin genes, which are key players in dorsal-ventral (DV) patterning. Since all of the multiple twin-tail ornamental goldfish strains share the same mutation, it is reasonable to presume that this mutation occurred only once in domesticated goldfish. However, zebrafish with mutated szl gene (another DV patterning-related gene) also exhibit twin-tail morphology and higher viability than dino/chordin-mutant zebrafish. This observation raises the question of whether the szl gene mutation could also reproduce the twin-tail morphology in goldfish. Here we show that goldfish have at least two subfunctionalized szl genes, designated szlA and szlB, and depletion of these genes in single-fin goldfish was able to reproduce the bifurcated caudal fin found in twin-tail ornamental goldfish. Interestingly, several phenotypes were observed in szlA-depleted fish, while low expressivity of the twin-tail phenotype was observed in szlB-depleted goldfish. Thus, even though szl gene mutations may produce twin-tail goldfish, these szl gene mutations might not be favorable for selection in domestic breeding. These results highlight the uniqueness and rarity of mutations that are able to cause large-scale morphological changes, such as a bifurcated axial skeleton, with high viability and expressivity in natural and domesticated populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available