4.7 Article

Evolution of the plasma environment of comet 67P from spacecraft potential measurements by the Rosetta Langmuir probe instrument

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 42, Issue 23, Pages 10126-10134

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015GL066599

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish National Space Board [109/12, 135/13, 166/14]
  2. Vetenskapsradet [621-2013-4191]
  3. CNRS
  4. CNES
  5. Observatoire de Paris
  6. Universite Paul Sabatier, Toulouse
  7. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council
  8. State of Bern
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation
  10. European Space Agency PRODEX Program
  11. STFC [ST/K001051/1, ST/H002383/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K001051/1, ST/H002383/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. UK Space Agency [ST/H004262/1, ST/K001698/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the evolution of the plasma environment of comet 67P using measurements of the spacecraft potential from early September 2014 (heliocentric distance 3.5 AU) to late March 2015 (2.1 AU) obtained by the Langmuir probe instrument. The low collision rate keeps the electron temperature high (similar to 5 eV), resulting in a negative spacecraft potential whose magnitude depends on the electron density. This potential is more negative in the northern (summer) hemisphere, particularly over sunlit parts of the neck region on the nucleus, consistent with neutral gas measurements by the Cometary Pressure Sensor of the Rosetta Orbiter Spectrometer for Ion and Neutral Analysis. Assuming constant electron temperature, the spacecraft potential traces the electron density. This increases as the comet approaches the Sun, most clearly in the southern hemisphere by a factor possibly as high as 20-44 between September 2014 and January 2015. The northern hemisphere plasma density increase stays around or below a factor of 8-12, consistent with seasonal insolation change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available