4.7 Article

Potential contribution of strigolactones in regulating scion growth and branching in grafted grapevine in response to nitrogen availability

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 69, Issue 16, Pages 4099-4112

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery206

Keywords

Grafting; grapevine; nitrogen; rootstocks; shoot branching; strigolactones

Categories

Funding

  1. Conseil Interprofessionnel duVin de Bordeaux (CIVB) [28325]
  2. French National Research Agency (ANR) within the Cluster of Excellence COTE [ANR-10-LABX-45]
  3. French Ministry of Research and fligher Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In grafted plants, rootstocks assure the mineral nutrition of the scion and modify its development. In this study, we show that two grapevine rootstock genotypes have different shoot branching architectures when cultivated as cuttings and that this trait is transmitted to the scion when grafted. Shoot branching plasticity in response to nitrogen supply was also studied. As strigolactones are known to have a role in the regulation of shoot development in response to nutrient availability, their involvement in the control of scion architecture by the rootstock was investigated. Functional characterization of putative grapevine strigolactone biosynthetic genes in Arabidopsis mutants or grapevine cell suspensions showed similar functions to those of Arabidopsis. Both rootstocks produced strigolactone-like compounds; the quantity produced in response to nitrogen treatments differed between the two rootstock genotypes and correlated with the expression of putative strigolactone biosynthetic genes. Exudation of strigolactone-like compounds by both rootstocks was closely related to the developmental pattern of the scion in grafted plants. These results suggest that differential regulation of strigolactone biosynthesis in response to nitrogen availability may contribute to the control of scion development conferred by each rootstock genotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available